When controlling silica dust exposure the hierarchy of control must be used:
Elimination
The first thing you must consider is whether a risk can be completely removed from the workplace.
If it is reasonably practicable, eliminate the silica containing products from your workplace. This will effectively remove the risk of workers being exposed to silica dust when working with these products.
In many cases, eliminating silica containing products may not be reasonably practicable. Elimination may not be possible if silica dust is naturally occurring at your workplace or you can’t make the end product or deliver a service without generating it.
If it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risk, then risks must be minimised, so far as is reasonably practicable, using the hierarchy of controls.
Substitution
Substitution is where you replace a product with something that is less hazardous and therefore has a lower risk.
Effective substitution of silica and silica containing products will depend on your workplace and the work tasks your workers carry out. Again, substitution might not be practicable where silica is naturally occurring or if it means you can’t make the end product or deliver a service.
Substitution can be an effective way of managing the risk of exposure to silica dust. For example, you can:
- use products that do not contain silica or have less silica in them
- use a silica containing product that does not need to be cut, ground or polished
Isolation
Isolation involves physically separating the source of harm from people.
This may involve placing barriers or distance between a hazard and your workers.
Isolation is an effective way of protecting your workers from exposure to silica dust. Physical barriers that remove the worker from contact with silica dust are the most effective form of isolation controls.
Isolation controls include:
- isolating high dust generation work processes within an enclosed room with restricted access
An example of an isolation booth used for automated wet cutting
- providing physical barriers and exclusion zones between different workers and workstations to prevent dust or water mist from moving into other work areas or towards other workers
- distancing a work process from other workers
- for example, consider where other workers are working when powered hand tools are used
- designating a room or area for other tasks such as changing or eating, away from the work area
You can also use barriers around automated tasks to shield workers from silica dust.
Wherever possible, workers should not fabricate silica containing products at the installation site. If modifications at the installation site need to be made, this work should be done outdoors in a designated area, wearing appropriate PPE and using engineering controls, including wet methods and dust collection systems.
Engineering controls
Engineering controls use physical methods to change the characteristics of a task, including mechanical devices or processes that eliminate or minimise the generation of dust and minimise it becoming airborne. Engineering controls to control silica dust can include:
- automation when cutting, grinding or drilling, using wet cutting methods, local exhaust ventilation
- drills, routers, saws and other equipment designed to be fitted with local exhaust ventilation and a water attachment to suppress dust using sacrificial backer-boards or spoil boards, fitting large machinery such as excavators and bulldozers with positive pressure enclosed cabs
- cleaning up dust with a M or H-class industrial vacuum cleaner
As many engineering controls are motorised you should be aware of noise and vibration levels at your workplace and issue personal hearing protection as needed.
Administrative controls
Administrative controls should only be used to provide additional protection and must only be considered after implementing substitution, isolation and engineering controls.
Administrative controls rely on worker behaviour and it is very important to have administrative policies and worker training when silica is identified at your workplace. You also need to supervise your workers to make sure they understand and follow your administrative policies.
Examples of administrative controls for silica dust include:
- planning cutting tasks to make sure the minimum number of cuts are made
- written rules and policies for working with silica or cleaning silica waste
- for example, having a written clean-up procedure and log
- a maintenance schedule and log for equipment and PPE
- shift rotation policies to make sure workers are not exposed to dust above the workplace exposure standard and for extended periods of time
- restricted area policies so that only staff who are carrying out a task that generates silica dust are allowed access to those areas
- signage at the workplace highlighting there is a dust hazard and any required use of RPE and PPE
Personal protective equipment
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is the least effective method for controlling risks. However, it can be effective at minimising residual risk when used in conjunction with higher order controls. Before working with silica containing products, a PCBU, the principal contractor or person in control of the workplace should assess the conditions likely to affect the health and safety of workers and arrange for the provision and use of appropriate PPE.
Fit testing should be repeated on a regular basis and based upon the outcomes of a risk assessment (e.g. every one or two years). For RPE to be effective, workers who are required to wear tight-fitting respirators must be clean shaven. If they cannot be clean shaven, ensure:
- there is no hair between their face and the seal of the respirator face piece as it can interfere with a proper fit. This is important as silica dust is smaller than facial hair
- facial hair does not interfere with the inhalation/exhalation valve operation
Respiratory protective equipment (RPE)- As silica dust particles are very small, workers should use a tight-fitting respirator with an effective face seal. This means they need to be clean-shaven or only have facial hair that does not interfere with the fitting surfaces or the respirator valve. As everyone’s face is a different size and shape, there is no ‘one size fits all’ tight-fitting respirator. This means that you should also fit test each worker and their RPE before they undertake dusty work. For workers who want to keep facial hair that may interfere with the operation or proper fit of tight-fitting respirator (for example a closely trimmed beard), a powered air purifying respirator with a loose hood may be suitable.
